CLIENT REVIEW BOARD
Feedback you can act on.
Not "make it pop".
Vague client feedback is almost never a difficult client. It is a client asked to react to work with no visible standard to judge it against. Put the concept next to the brief it answers, let comments land on the work itself, and the notes that come back stop being adjectives. Plans start at $7.99 a month billed annually.
From $7.99/month annual
View-only needs no account
Comments on the work
Used by creative professionals at:
Artlist
Pixar
Nike
Red Bull
The North Face
Porsche
Start from a ready-made template
Pick a board to see what you can build, then let AI fill it in. Every template is a real, editable starting point on the same infinite canvas.
Design Planner
Plan a design project from brief to delivery, with references, tasks, and feedback side by side.
How do you present design concepts to clients?
Show the work beside the brief it is answering, and ask a specific question. A concept presented alone invites a taste response, because taste is the only tool the client has been given. The same concept presented next to the objective it was built against invites a judgement about whether it does the job, which is a different and far more useful conversation.
Ask for a decision rather than for feedback. "What do you think" produces adjectives; "does this reach the audience we agreed, and if not, where does it miss" produces something actionable. The question you ask shapes the answer you get, and most bad client feedback is a bad question asked politely.
Then make the feedback attachable. Notes in an email thread lose their referent the moment the work moves on, and "the third one, second row" is meaningless once anything is rearranged. Comments that live on the board next to the specific element they concern survive revisions and survive being forwarded to whoever else has an opinion.
Storyflow keeps the brief, the concepts, the references and the comments on one canvas, shared by a view-only link that opens in a browser with no signup. The AI reads the whole active board plus up to three Tactics, five documents and three boards, so a question like whether this round still answers the original brief is answered from both, on the same board. Plans start at $7.99 per month billed annually, priced flat per account, with a free plan before the end of 2026.
HOW IT WORKS
Four steps to feedback worth having.
Most of the work is done before the client opens the link.
01
Put the brief on the board
The objective, audience and constraints sit beside the work, so there is a visible standard to judge against rather than only taste.
02
Show the concepts
Two directions rather than one or five, each named, with a sentence saying what it commits to and what it rules out.
03
Ask a specific question
Not what do you think. Ask whether it does the job you agreed it had to do, and where it falls short if it does not.
04
Collect comments on the work
Feedback lands beside the element it concerns, so it stays meaningful after the next revision and after being forwarded.
The brief is the standard, so put it in the room.
Clients give taste feedback when taste is the only instrument you handed them.
Work beside the brief
Judge against the objective
The concept and the brief it answers sit on the same canvas, which turns a reaction into an assessment and changes what comes back.
See brief to project board →
Comments that point at something
No more "the second one"
Notes attach to the specific element rather than to a position in a layout, so they survive the board being rearranged.
See the design feedback tool →
One link, forwardable
The decision-maker is rarely in the meeting
View-only opens in a browser with no signup, so the person you presented to can pass it to whoever actually signs off.
See moodboards for clients →
Rounds stay in one place
See how it got here
Previous rounds and their feedback stay on the canvas, so round three can be checked against what round one was asked to fix.
See the design review board →Plans from $7.99/month annual. Free plan coming late 2026.
Clients read view-only with no account, and pricing is flat per account rather than per seat. Free plan before the end of 2026.
View-only links open without an account
Flat account pricing rather than per seat
One board per client project, no limit
Export to image or PDF when needed
WHY FEEDBACK GOES WRONG
Four causes of unusable notes.
None of them are the client being difficult, and all of them are fixable by the person presenting.
Cause one
No standard to judge against
Taste is the fallback: Shown work and nothing else, a client can only tell you whether they like it, because that is the only question available.
Put the brief in view: With the objective visible, the question becomes whether the work meets it, which anyone can answer usefully.
Disagreements get specific: An argument about whether a concept reaches the agreed audience is productive. One about whether it is nice is not.
Cause two
The wrong question was asked
"What do you think" invites reaction: It is an open question about preference, so it returns preference, and then everyone is surprised by the answer.
Ask about the job: Does this reach the audience, does it say the thing we agreed, where does it miss. These have answers you can work from.
Ask for a choice: Two named directions and a request to pick produces a decision. One direction produces a list of tweaks.
Cause three
Comments detached from the work
Threads lose the referent: A note about the header means nothing two revisions later, because the thread does not know which version it described.
Attach it to the element: A comment on the board stays with the thing it concerns, through rearrangement and through forwarding.
One place, not four: Feedback arriving by email, call, message and document guarantees something gets lost between them.
Cause four
The real approver never saw it
Presented to the wrong person: Your contact is often not the decision-maker, and a round of notes from them can be entirely overturned later.
Make it forwardable: A view-only link that needs no account travels to whoever actually decides, which is the fastest route to real sign-off.
Everyone sees one version: No exported copies means no situation where two stakeholders are reviewing different rounds.
Explore templates for your project
Every template opens as a real, editable board on the infinite canvas. Pick the closest fit and make it your own.
Design Planner
Plan a design project from brief to delivery, with references, tasks, and feedback side by side.
What creators are saying
Join early creators getting structured workspaces and AI that remembers their projects
“Storyflow has sped up my workflow by at least 3x, which means more flow state and more projects I can actually ship. It truly changed the way me and my team create.”
Reilin Joey
Director & YouTuber
“One prompt gets me a structured board. But the tactics are my favorite. I run my YouTube scripts through them and my intros and retention got better. It's amazing.”
Justkay
YouTuber & Freelance Filmmaker
“I used to juggle five apps to plan a project. Now I describe what I am making and get boards, lists, and a schedule. All in one place.”
George
@fernwehchronicles
Client reviews, answered.
The questions that decide whether a round is useful.
One that shows the work beside the brief it answers and lets comments attach to the work itself. A concept presented alone invites taste feedback because taste is the only instrument the client has; presented next to the objective, it invites a judgement about whether it does the job. Storyflow puts the brief, the concepts and the comments on one canvas shared by a view-only link that opens with no account, so the notes that come back are attached to specific elements and survive both revisions and forwarding.
Give the client something to judge against.
Work beside the brief, comments on the work, one link that reaches the actual approver. Plans from $7.99 a month billed annually.