The 10 Best Moodboard Apps That Work With ChatGPT and Claude in 2026 (Ranked on Assistant Access)

Key Takeaways

• Storyflow ranks first for one reason you can check: from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Grok, your assistant can place up to 12 reference images per call, a named colour palette and notes on a Storyflow board, then read the board back and tell you what changed and who changed it.
• Miro is a close second. Its official MCP server reads boards, creates image items and works with Claude and ChatGPT on every Miro plan, including free teams. It is the right choice when the moodboard has to sit next to a team's existing Miro work.
• Figma's MCP server lists FigJam with read and write access for both Claude and ChatGPT, but Figma's help center says you need a Full or Dev seat for full use, and FigJam is a design team's whiteboard before it is a moodboard.
• Canva's connector makes and finds designs from a chat. That is a finished layout, not a board you curate, so it suits the pitch page at the end, not the thinking in the middle.
• Milanote, Pinterest, Cosmos and PureRef publish no ChatGPT or Claude connector that we could find in October 2026. They are still excellent at collecting and arranging by hand, which is why they appear here at all.
• A photo you attach in a chat never reaches any of these boards on its own. In Storyflow the assistant gives you an upload link instead; in the others you upload it yourself.
• Cost for one person working with an assistant: Storyflow from $7.99 a month billed annually with no MCP limit on any paid plan, Miro free or $8 a member a month billed annually, Milanote free for 100 items or $9.99 a person a month billed annually.
• Storyflow is paid-only during early access and runs in a browser only. If you need a free board today or an offline reference window, Milanote and PureRef cover those cases.

Why "Can My Assistant Use It?" Is Now a Moodboard Question

You open ChatGPT or Claude, describe the campaign, and within a minute you have a sharp creative direction: three moods, twelve reference ideas, a palette with hex codes. Then you spend forty minutes copying it into a moodboard app, one image at a time, and by the end the chat and the board disagree. The chat is where the thinking happened. The board is where the client looks. Nothing connects them.

That gap is new. Until 2025, a moodboard app was judged on how it collected images and how pleasant it was to arrange them. Now a large share of creative direction starts as a conversation with an assistant, and the useful question is whether that assistant can work on the board itself.

The chat is good at direction and bad at holding it

An assistant can name the facets of a look (light, material, texture, colour, location, wardrobe) faster than you can. What it cannot do is keep that direction in a place your client can open, arrange or comment on. A chat scrolls away. A board stays. The moodboard app that matters in 2026 is the one your assistant can write to, not the one you paste into.

Reading the board back matters as much as building it

The second half of the job is the one most lists skip. A week after the first draft, your art director has moved six tiles, deleted two and added a note that says "too cold". If your assistant cannot read the board, every new request starts from the chat's stale version. If it can, you ask "what changed on the board this week, and what does it say about the direction now?" and get an answer grounded in the real board.

What a connector actually is

A connector is a link between your assistant and an app, and in 2026 most of them run on the Model Context Protocol (MCP), an open standard for letting an assistant call another app's tools. Claude adds remote MCP servers as custom connectors on every plan, with one custom connector on the Free plan, per Anthropic's support article. ChatGPT adds them through developer mode, described in OpenAI's help center. For Storyflow specifically, ChatGPT needs Plus or above. If you want the longer explainer, our Storyflow MCP page covers what the server reads and builds.

How We Ranked the 10 Moodboard Apps

This is a narrow ranking on purpose. "Best moodboard app" lists usually weigh image collection and price. This one adds the question that decides a 2026 workflow: can ChatGPT or Claude build the board and read it back? We wrote it for the people who owe someone a direction, such as art and creative directors, brand marketers, photographers and agency teams.

A tool gets credit only for a capability its vendor documents on its own pages, checked on 9 October 2026. Where we could not confirm a connector, we scored it as absent and said so.

How the scores add up

Each app gets a 1 to 10 score per criterion, and the rating is the weighted sum rounded to one decimal. Storyflow scores 10, 10, 7, 9, 9 and 7 for 8.9. Miro scores 8, 8, 7, 8, 5 and 9 for 7.6. Storyflow loses to Milanote on hand craft and to Miro on cost, and wins the two assistant rows, which carry half the weight.

What we did not weigh

• Brand tenure. Milanote, Pinterest and Miro have years of templates and community boards; that is real comfort, but it does not change what your assistant can do.
• Image generation quality. Midjourney and Firefly make better single images than any board's built-in generator. This list is about the board.
• Third-party bridges. Several services wrap Pinterest or Are.na in an MCP server you host or pay for. We scored only what the vendor itself publishes.

Comparison Table: 10 Moodboard Apps and Their ChatGPT and Claude Connections

Prices are in USD as listed on each vendor's own page on 9 October 2026. Storyflow's monthly-billed price is $9.99.

The 10 Best Moodboard Apps That Work With ChatGPT and Claude, Reviewed

Every review follows the same shape: the verdict, who it is for, the price, why it ranks where it does, then strengths and limits. Connector claims link to the vendor's own documentation.

1. Storyflow

Verdict: the only moodboard app here where your assistant can build the whole board (images, palette, notes) and then read it back, including what changed and who changed it.

Best for: art directors, brand marketers, photographers and agency teams who plan in ChatGPT or Claude and owe a client a direction.

Pricing: Plus $7.99 a month billed annually ($9.99 monthly), Pro $14 a month billed annually ($19 monthly) with AI image generation, Max $39 a month billed annually ($49 monthly) with a team workspace, roles and permissions. Paid-only during early access; a Free plan launches before the end of 2026, and anyone a paid member invites joins free now. See Storyflow pricing.

Why it ranks first: Storyflow is a visual project planning workspace for creative work: an infinite canvas that holds images, notes, tables, documents, moodboards, storyboards and slide decks. Its MCP server lives at one address, mcp.storyflow.so/mcp, and works with any assistant that can add a remote MCP server: Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude Code, Cursor and more. For a moodboard, three of its tools do the work. The image tool takes up to 12 image addresses in one call, downloads each one and keeps Storyflow's own copy, so a tile does not break when the source link dies. The palette tool builds a grid of swatches, each with its name, hex and RGB. The read tools return what is on the board, and what changed and who changed it. Inside the app, the built-in AI has a moodboard workflow that asks whether tiles should come from a web search or be generated, then builds 9 to 16 uniform tiles, each showing a different facet of the subject. The board opens for a client by view-only link with no account, and they sign in to comment.

Strengths:

• The assistant places images, palette and notes on the board; you do not paste anything.
• The assistant reads the board back, including recent changes, so a revision starts from the real board.
• You choose at sign-in which projects the assistant may use and whether it may make changes at all.
• No MCP limit on Plus, Pro or Max, and the connector runs on your assistant's model, so it spends no Storyflow AI credits.
• The moodboard sits on the same board as the brief, the shot list and the deck, so the next step needs no second app.

Limitations:

• Paid-only during early access. A free board today means Milanote, Miro or Pinterest.
• Browser only: no native desktop or mobile app and no offline mode.
• Hand-arranging is good but not Milanote-good; Milanote's layout feels nicer when you place every tile yourself.
• AI image generation is on Pro and Max only. Plus users source references from the web or upload their own.

Try it: connect it in five minutes with the steps in our help article on connecting AI assistants, or start from the AI mood board maker inside the app.

2. Miro

Verdict: the strongest connector among the incumbents, and the most generous access rule: Miro's MCP server works on every plan, including free teams.

Best for: teams whose workshops, research and planning already live on Miro, who want the moodboard on the same boards.

Pricing: Free with 3 editable boards; Starter $8 a member a month and Business $20 a member a month, both billed annually, per Miro's pricing page.

Why it ranks second: Miro's MCP documentation describes four jobs: summarising and searching boards, building boards, generating diagrams and acting on comments. It lists Claude, ChatGPT, Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI and VS Code as supported clients, and it respects existing board permissions. The Miro MCP tools list includes image_create, which puts an image on a board, canvas tools that read and write a board as SVG, and comment tools that list, reply to and resolve threads. That is a real read and build loop. It ranks below Storyflow on the build row because a moodboard is not a native shape in Miro's tool set: there is no palette tool, and the table tools are marked as being deprecated, so the assistant composes the board from general canvas content.

Strengths:

• Works on Miro's free plan, with 100 MCP calls a day.
• Reads boards and comments, so the assistant can answer from feedback threads.
• Miro is where many teams already are, so nothing new to learn.

Limitations:

• Free plan keeps only your three most recent boards editable.
• No moodboard or palette tool; the assistant builds from generic canvas items.
• Per-member pricing adds up for a team, unlike a flat plan.

For a direct comparison of the two boards beyond connectors, read Storyflow vs Miro.

3. Figma and FigJam

Verdict: the broadest client support of any app here, built for design files first and moodboards second.

Best for: product and brand design teams that already keep references in FigJam next to their Figma files.

Pricing: Starter is free with limited access; on Professional a Collab seat with full FigJam access is $3 a month and a Full seat $16 a month, per Figma's pricing page.

Why it ranks third: Figma's MCP catalog lists Claude and ChatGPT as supporting Figma Design, Figma Make and FigJam with read and write access, and lists FigJam read and write for a long tail of clients from Cursor to Grok. That breadth is unmatched. Two things hold it back for moodboards. First, Figma's setup article says you need a Full or Dev seat, and that other seats may have usage limits, so the $3 Collab seat is not the whole story. Second, Figma's pages describe what the server does in design files and do not describe FigJam moodboard actions, so we could not credit it with placing images or palettes on a FigJam board.

Strengths:

• Supported by more AI clients than any other app here.
• References sit next to the real design files, so handoff is short.
• Read and write access listed for both Claude and ChatGPT.

Limitations:

• Full use needs a Full or Dev seat.
• No documented moodboard-specific actions in FigJam.
• A designer's tool; a client or producer may find it heavy.

4. Canva

Verdict: the best connector for a finished, designed page made from a chat, and the wrong shape for a working moodboard.

Best for: marketers who need a polished one-page moodboard or pitch slide fast, and who will refine it in Canva.

Pricing: Canva's prices vary by country, so check its pricing page for yours.

Why it ranks fourth: the Canva connector for Claude lists tools to search your designs, read their content, import a design from a URL, export, organise folders, add comment threads and generate new designs. Canva's help center covers the ChatGPT side, where you describe a design and open the result in Canva to edit. What comes back is a layout, which is right for the deck page at the end of a moodboard process. It is not a board where 40 references get gathered, cut to 12 and argued over, and the assistant cannot read a Canva design as a set of tiles with notes.

Strengths:

• Generates editable designs straight from a prompt, per its connector listing.
• Finds and exports your existing designs from the chat.
• Huge template library for the final presentation.

Limitations:

• Output is a designed page, not a curatable board.
• Brand features and exports happen back in Canva, per Canva's help center.
• Prices vary by country, so this list does not quote one.

5. Are.na

Verdict: a research collector with a real, official MCP server, aimed at Claude and coding tools rather than ChatGPT.

Best for: researchers, writers and designers who build long-running reference channels.

Pricing: the free Guest tier is limited to 200 connections; Premium removes the limit, with prices on Are.na's billing page, per Are.na's help center.

Why it ranks fifth: the Are.na MCP server, published in Are.na's own GitHub organisation, connects to Claude as a custom connector, to Claude Code, to Codex and to Cursor, and exposes more than 40 tools generated from Are.na's API. ChatGPT is not among the documented clients. Are.na's strength is the channel, a long list of blocks you connect over months; it is not a canvas you arrange into a client-facing board, which caps its craft score.

Strengths:

• Official server with OAuth sign-in and no keys to paste.
• Deep, durable research channels.
• A calm, ad-free place to collect.

Limitations:

• No ChatGPT setup documented.
• Channels, not a free-form canvas.
• Free tier capped at 200 connections.

6. Adobe Firefly Boards

Verdict: the best canvas for generating and remixing images, with no connector to the board itself.

Best for: designers in the Adobe ecosystem who want generated concept imagery on an infinite canvas.

Pricing: Firefly Boards is free to try, and Adobe's Firefly plans page lists Boards in every paid plan, for individuals and for teams.

Why it ranks sixth: Firefly Boards has a Generate Mood Board feature and access to several image models on one canvas, so its built-in AI is the strongest here for invented imagery. The connector story is separate. Adobe brought Photoshop, Adobe Express and Acrobat into ChatGPT, free, per Adobe's announcement, and Express in ChatGPT lets you browse templates, fill in text and replace images. That is not Firefly Boards, and we found no connector that lets ChatGPT or Claude build or read a Firefly board.

Strengths:

• Strongest in-app image generation for moodboards on this list.
• Several image models on one canvas.
• Adobe Express in ChatGPT is free for quick designed pieces.

Limitations:

• Your assistant cannot build or read a Firefly board.
• Generations spend credits on paid plans.
• Generated tiles are concepts, not references to real places or products.

7. Milanote

Verdict: the most pleasant board to arrange by hand, and invisible to your assistant.

Best for: anyone who wants to place every tile themselves and does not plan in ChatGPT or Claude.

Pricing: Free with 100 notes, images or links and 10 file uploads; $9.99 a person a month billed annually ($12.50 monthly); a team option at $49 a month billed annually, per Milanote's plans page.

Why it ranks seventh: on a list about hand craft alone, Milanote would be near the top, and its craft score here is the only 10. But its plans page lists no AI features and no ChatGPT or Claude connector, and we found none published elsewhere. Every reference your assistant finds has to be copied in by you, and nothing on the board can be read back. That puts it below apps that do half the assistant job. If you want Milanote's feel with an assistant attached, read our Milanote alternatives roundup.

Strengths:

• Best manual layout and feel of any app here.
• A free tier that costs nothing to start.
• Strong templates for creative work.

Limitations:

• No connector: the assistant cannot build or read the board.
• No AI features listed.
• The free tier's 100 items fill quickly on a real project.

8. Cosmos

Verdict: a beautiful visual bookmarking app with useful AI attribution, and no assistant connection.

Best for: designers who collect references every day on phone and desktop.

Pricing: Free for core features; Premium $8 a month, per Cosmos's own summary file.

Why it ranks eighth: Cosmos runs on the web, iOS and Android with browser extensions, and its AI captions identify the artist, photographer or studio behind an image, which matters when a client asks where a reference came from. Its pages mention no ChatGPT, Claude or MCP integration, so it scores at the floor on both assistant rows.

Strengths:

• Native mobile apps and browser extensions.
• AI attribution of image sources.
• Free collaboration.

Limitations:

• No connector found.
• Clusters, not a canvas for a client presentation.

9. PureRef

Verdict: the best reference window on your desktop, and the most offline tool here.

Best for: illustrators, retouchers and 3D artists who want references always on top while they work.

Pricing: Personal use is pay what you want; a small business licence is a one-time $49 for up to 3 users; Business is $8 a seat a month billed annually, per PureRef's download page.

Why it ranks ninth: PureRef runs on Windows, Mac and Linux and does one job very well. It describes no AI and no integrations, so an assistant cannot reach it. Use it beside an assistant-connected board, not instead of one.

Strengths:

• Desktop app that works offline.
• Pay what you want for personal use.

Limitations:

• No connector, no AI, no client sharing link.

10. Pinterest

Verdict: still the best place to find references, and the furthest from your assistant.

Best for: discovery at the start of any moodboard.

Pricing: free to use at pinterest.com.

Why it ranks tenth: we found no official Pinterest connector or MCP server for ChatGPT or Claude. Third-party services wrap Pinterest's business API, but they need your own API credentials and are not Pinterest's product. A Pinterest board is also a feed, not a canvas you present. Collect there, then decide somewhere your assistant can reach.

Strengths:

• The largest pool of visual references.
• Free.

Limitations:

• No official connector.
• Not built to present a direction to a client.

What Your Assistant Can Actually Do in Each App

Marketing pages say "works with ChatGPT". This table says what that means for a moodboard, based only on each vendor's own documentation.

Why "stored copies" matters

A moodboard built from hot-linked images decays. Sites change their file paths, and hot-linked tiles turn into grey boxes. When Storyflow's image tool receives an address, it downloads the picture and keeps its own copy in your gallery, so the board you showed the client in March still looks the same in June. For more on rights when the references are someone else's photographs, read our guide to moodboard images for commercial client work.

Why reading changes matters

Most revision requests are about the delta: what the art director moved, what the client deleted. Storyflow's board-changes read returns what changed and who changed it, so you can ask your assistant to explain a revision in one line, not reconstruct it from memory.

A Worked Example: A 12-Tile Skincare Campaign Moodboard Built From Claude

Here is an illustrative job, start to finish. The brief, facets and action count are an example, not a measurement. A brand marketer has a brief for a summer skincare launch: "sun on skin, salt, unbleached linen, nothing glossy". The deliverable is a moodboard the client approves before the photographer is booked.

Step 1: The direction, in the chat

The marketer asks Claude for three directions, and picks one: "Late Light", morning and late-afternoon sun on bare skin, sea salt textures, raw linen and sand tones. Claude names 12 facets: backlit shoulder, salt crystals on skin, linen in wind, wet sand ripples, terracotta tile, olive branch shadow, glass bottle on stone, sun-bleached towel, hands cupping water, freckles in close-up, white-washed wall, and dusk sea.

Step 2: The board, built by the assistant

With Storyflow connected, the marketer asks Claude to build it. Claude searches the web for one photo per facet and hands the 12 image addresses to Storyflow in a single call. Storyflow downloads them and lays them out as uniform tiles. Claude then builds a five-swatch palette (sand, salt white, terracotta, olive, dusk blue) with hex and RGB, and adds three notes: the one-line direction, what to avoid ("no gloss, no studio white"), and the open question for the client ("model with or without visible freckles?").

Step 3: The count

On a paid plan there is no limit, so the count only matters to an invited collaborator on a free account, who gets 25 actions a week: enough for two first drafts like this one, with 7 actions left for edits. The draft took one prompt and a few minutes; the forty minutes of copy and paste from the opening of this article are gone.

Step 4: The revision, a week later

The art director deletes two tiles that read as too cold, drags the terracotta tile to the top-left, and writes "more grain" on the board. The client comments that freckles should stay. The marketer asks Claude: "What changed on the Late Light board this week, and who changed it? Then replace the two deleted tiles with warmer options." Claude reads the board's changes, answers in three lines, and places two new images. The direction stays on one board the client opens by view-only link with no account, and signs in to comment.

What the same job looks like elsewhere

In Miro, the same loop works with image items and canvas content, minus a palette tool, and Miro's free plan covers it if the board is one of your three editable ones. In Milanote, step 2 becomes 12 manual image saves and a palette built by hand, and step 4 starts with you describing the changes to the assistant because it cannot see them. For the full method from a brief to a board, read how to turn a brief into a moodboard with AI.

Prompts to Copy for Building and Reading a Moodboard

Paste these into ChatGPT or Claude after connecting Storyflow. They work as written; swap the bracketed parts.

Two prompting rules that save a revision

• Ask for facets, not images. "12 different facets" gives you a board; "12 images of a beach" gives you twelve beaches.
• Ask the assistant to read the board before every revision. It costs one action and stops it from working from the chat's outdated version.

How to Connect Storyflow to ChatGPT or Claude in Five Minutes

The address is the same for every assistant: https://mcp.storyflow.so/mcp. The full steps, including Cursor, VS Code and Gemini CLI, are in our help article.

Connect Claude

1. In Claude, open Customize, then Connectors.
2. Click Add, then Add custom connector.
3. Name it Storyflow, paste the address and click Continue.
4. Choose Sign in now, click Add, and sign in to Storyflow. Claude's Free plan allows one custom connector.

Connect ChatGPT

1. In ChatGPT on the web, open Settings, then Security and login, and turn on Developer mode. On Business and Enterprise plans an admin does this.
2. Go to chatgpt.com/plugins and click the plus button.
3. Name it Storyflow, choose Public endpoint and paste the address.
4. Create it and sign in to Storyflow. ChatGPT needs Plus or above for this.

Connect Gemini, Grok or Claude Code

• Gemini app: Settings, Connected Apps, Custom apps, Add a custom app, paste the address. It needs a personal Google account with Keep Activity on, in the US, for people 18 or over, in English.
• Grok: grok.com/connectors, New Connector, Custom, paste the address and sign in. On Grok Business and Enterprise, an admin adds it in the xAI console first.
• Claude Code: run claude mcp add --transport http storyflow https://mcp.storyflow.so/mcp in your terminal, then type /mcp to sign in.

Choose what it may touch

At sign-in, Storyflow asks which projects the assistant may use (all, or the ones you pick), whether it may make changes (otherwise it only reads), and whether it may use your documents outside projects. You can disconnect in Settings, then Connected apps, and access ends within a minute. Every connection expires after 30 days.

What It Costs: The App, the Connector and the Assistant

The money is in the plans around each connector, not in the connector itself. Assistant plans are priced separately by OpenAI and Anthropic and are not included below.

How to read the table

If you already pay for Claude or ChatGPT, the incremental cost of an assistant-connected moodboard is the app plan. Miro costs nothing to start if three editable boards are enough. Storyflow starts at $7.99 a month billed annually, and its Max plan is a flat $39 a month billed annually with no per-member fee, which matters once a small team needs roles. Milanote is cheap and capable for hand-built boards, and the time cost lands on you, because every assistant suggestion is copied in by hand.

Decision Rules: Which Moodboard App for Which Situation

You plan in ChatGPT or Claude and owe a client a direction

Use Storyflow. The assistant builds and revises the board, the client opens it by link with no account, and the moodboard sits on the same board as the brief and the shot list. When the direction is approved, read how to turn a moodboard into a shot list.

Your team already runs on Miro

Use Miro's MCP server and keep the moodboard next to the workshop boards. Switching apps for one deliverable is rarely worth it.

The output is a designed page, not a board

Use Canva's connector to generate the page from the chat, then finish it in Canva. Build the thinking first on a board, then lay out the result.

You want to arrange every tile by hand, or you need free today

Use Milanote for a free hand-built board, or Pinterest to collect, and accept that the assistant will not see either. When you are ready to pitch, our guide to presenting a mood board to a client covers the meeting itself.

Common Mistakes When You Moodboard With an AI Assistant

Mistake 1: Attaching photos in the chat and expecting them on the board

A picture you attach in ChatGPT or Claude stays in the chat. It does not travel to Storyflow, Miro or any other board through the connector. In Storyflow, ask the assistant for an upload link and drop the files there; the tool exists for exactly this.

Mistake 2: Letting the assistant generate every tile

A moodboard about a real place, product or material should reference real photographs. Generated tiles are for things that do not exist yet. Storyflow's in-app workflow asks this question before it builds; ask it yourself when you work from a chat.

Mistake 3: Twelve images of one thing

"Beach summer skincare" returns twelve beaches. Ask for different facets (light, texture, material, colour, gesture, location) and each tile earns its place.

Mistake 4: Revising from the chat's memory

The chat remembers the board as it was built, not as it is. Always ask the assistant to read the board first, then revise.

Mistake 5: Giving the connector more access than the job needs

You can limit a Storyflow connection to one project and to read-only. For a client board, pick the project, allow changes only when you want the assistant to build, and disconnect when the job ends.

When Storyflow Is Not the Right Choice

Storyflow ranks first on a job-specific criterion, and it is not the answer to every moodboard. Choose something else when:

• You need a free board today. Storyflow is paid-only during early access. Milanote's free tier, Miro's free plan and Pinterest all cost nothing now.
• You work offline or want a desktop reference window. Storyflow runs in a browser only. PureRef is the tool for an always-on-top reference board.
• You want the best generated images. Storyflow's image generation is on Pro and Max and is not built to beat dedicated generators; Firefly Boards or Midjourney make stronger concept imagery.
• Your whole team already works in Miro or FigJam. A second board for one deliverable splits attention. Use their connectors.
• You need formal proofing. Storyflow has no approve button and no versioned approval trail; comments on the board and a note recording the decision are what it offers.
• You need a native mobile capture app. Cosmos and Pinterest have mobile apps; Storyflow does not.

A Moodboard Template for Assistant-Built Boards

Use this layout whether the assistant builds the board or you do. It makes the board readable by a client and by an assistant on the next revision.

Why the decision log matters

A moodboard approved in a meeting is forgotten in a fortnight. One line per decision, on the board, is what your assistant reads when you ask "what did the client approve?" a month later. For briefing the board so the approval sticks, read how to brief a moodboard so the client approves it.

Templates that already follow this shape

If you would rather start from a page than a blank board, our brand moodboard, photoshoot moodboard and moodboard for clients pages show finished boards in this layout.

The Bottom Line

The moodboard question changed in 2026. It used to be which app collects and arranges images best, and Milanote and Pinterest still win that. Now that so much creative direction starts in ChatGPT and Claude, the better question is which board your assistant can build and read. On that job Storyflow ranks first: one connection, and your assistant places the references, builds the palette, writes the notes, reads the revisions and keeps the board in a place your client can open. Miro is the strong second for teams already there. Start with the Storyflow MCP page, connect your assistant, and ask it to build your next moodboard.