The 12 Best Storyboarding Software Tools in 2026 (Tested for Film and Video)

Quick Picks: Best Storyboarding Software 2026 by Use Case

Best Overall: Storyflow Storyflow is the only storyboarding workspace where AI reads your narrative before it responds. Add a Hero's Journey Blueprint Tactic to structure your story arc, @-mention your script document in the AI chat, and get scene and shot suggestions grounded in the full project context already on the canvas. Starts at $7.99/month billed annually (Plus tier). One limitation: there is no dedicated frame-by-frame panel view with timing annotations or per-frame duration controls. Storyflow organises scenes spatially on an infinite canvas, not in a sequential numbered grid.

Best Dedicated Storyboarding Tool: Boords Purpose-built for film and animation storyboarding. Numbered panels, animatic preview from uploaded frames, and client approval workflows are standard features, not add-ons. At approximately $16.99/month, it is the clearest tool for production teams who need a polished PDF deliverable and a client-facing annotation link. The trade-off: no meaningful AI assistance for structure or story logic. What you draw into a frame is all the tool knows about it.

Best for Visual Reference + Rough Boards: Milanote The cleanest environment for developing visual direction before committing to drawn frames. Directors who think visually before writing use Milanote to build reference boards that gradually become rough boards. Free plan includes 100 notes and 10 uploads. The limitation: no frame numbering, no sequence logic, no narrative structure. This is a mood board that doubles as a rough visual plan.

Best for Team Storyboarding Sessions: Miro Miro's facilitation tools make collaborative storyboarding sessions work. Templates, sticky note voting, and timer features are built for teams who plan content together in a room. At $8/user/month billed annually. The limitation: storyboarding is one of hundreds of Miro use cases. Filmmaking-specific features require configuration from a blank template every time.

Best for Script + Storyboard Integration: Celtx Connects your script, shot list, and storyboard inside one pre-production suite. For teams managing a complete production pipeline, the link between scene dialogue and visual panels is genuinely useful. At approximately $15/month. The limitation: the storyboard interface is functional, not elegant. It exists to serve the production pipeline, not to be the best standalone storyboarding experience.

Best for Design Teams Storyboarding Product or UX Flows: FigJam Figma teams already using FigJam for product work can extend the same canvas to storyboarding demo flows, onboarding sequences, or marketing concepts. At $3/collaborator seat per month billed annually. The limitation: not built for narrative film storyboarding. Scene-to-scene storytelling and shot composition planning require more manual setup than a filmmaking-first tool.

Best Free Option: Storyboarder by Wonderunit The best fully free desktop storyboard application. Open-source, designed specifically for filmmakers who draw their own frames on a tablet or digitiser. No subscription, no cloud sync, no collaboration. It is a drawing tool for frames and nothing more, but for solo filmmakers sketching on a budget, it is hard to beat for the price.

Storyflow's AI reads everything currently on your canvas board. @-mention your script document and a Hero's Journey Blueprint Tactic in the same AI chat, and it has the full narrative context before it responds. For a storyboarding environment, that context gap is significant. Try Storyflow free and see how AI reads your project

Comparison Table: Best Storyboarding Software 2026

Rating criteria: Film/video workflow depth was weighted most heavily (30%) in 2026 because it is the clearest dividing line between tools designed for storytelling and tools adapted from general canvases. A tool built for narrative sequencing scored higher than one adapted from a whiteboard. AI depth (20%), ease of use (20%), collaboration (15%), integrations (10%), pricing (5%).

Storyflow leads on AI because its film workflow is tied to narrative context awareness that no other tool on this list offers. Boords leads on film-specific delivery features. The gap between them is what you value: AI-guided story development during pre-production, or clean panel delivery to a client at the end of it.

Best Storyboarding Software 2026: Market Context

The storyboard software market divides into two categories that almost never overlap. On one side are dedicated panel tools built for frame delivery: numbered grids, animatic preview, PDF export, client approval. On the other side are general visual canvas tools that filmmakers and video creators have adapted for pre-production because nothing else is connected enough.

The dedicated tools do one thing well and nothing else. Your frames live in Boords. Your brief lives in Notion. Your script lives in Google Docs. Your visual references live in Milanote or Pinterest. The storyboard becomes a deliverable disconnected from the thinking that produced it. Most productions manage this by maintaining the connection manually, which is how briefs get out of date and scene decisions get made twice.

The canvas tools are flexible but uninstructed. Miro will hold a storyboard but will not help you build one. Milanote has the right visual feel but no concept of scene order or narrative arc. The tools starting to close this gap are the AI-first workspaces. Storyflow is the clearest example of a canvas that treats storyboarding as narrative development, not just frame production. Its online storyboard maker runs entirely in the browser, so the canvas and the panels stay in one place.

How We Evaluated the Best Storyboarding Software 2026

Five criteria determined every rating. Here is what each test specifically involved.

Ease of use: I started a new project from scratch in each tool and ran a complete 10-scene rough board from concept to reviewable arrangement. I measured time to first frame, toolbar friction, and whether the basic gestures for placing and reordering scenes felt natural or required consulting a help document.

Film and video workflow depth: I tested whether each tool understood narrative structure, supported frame sequencing in a production context, and produced output a director or director of photography could use. Tools built specifically for film scored higher than tools where storyboarding is a feature adapted from a general canvas.

Collaboration: I tested real-time editing, comment threads, guest access without full account requirements, and client review links. The scenario: a three-person team plus one external producer who needed to annotate frames asynchronously. Tools that required client seat purchases for external annotation scored lower.

Integrations: I checked connections to scriptwriting tools, export formats for PDF storyboard deliverables, and whether a completed board could move into production software without manual data entry. A storyboard locked inside one tool creates a handoff problem at the start of production.

Pricing and value: I compared what a five-person production team pays annually across all tools. The question was not which tool costs less but which delivers production-quality output at a price a small production or creative agency can sustain.

Every tool on this list was tested with real project work, not feature checklists pulled from marketing pages.

Detailed Reviews: Best Storyboarding Software 2026

1. Storyflow

Storyflow is a visual AI workspace built for creators, filmmakers, marketers, and strategists who need their ideas, structure, and execution inside one project. It is not purpose-built for storyboarding the way Boords is. It is built for the creative development that storyboarding is one part of: the brief, the narrative framework, the visual references, the scene plan, and the script all living in the same connected canvas.

That distinction matters most in the middle of development. In Boords, your storyboard is a sequence of frames with no awareness of the brief or script that produced them. In Storyflow, your rough panels sit on the same canvas as your Hero's Journey Blueprint Tactic, your director's notes Document, and your visual reference images. The AI reads all of it when you ask a question about scene structure, pacing, or visual tone.

Best for: Filmmakers and video creators who develop narrative structure, visual direction, and scene planning inside the same environment.

Key features:

Infinite canvas with spatial storyboarding. Storyflow's whiteboard lets you arrange scene panels, reference images, notes, and narrative frameworks spatially on an unlimited canvas. There is no fixed grid or numbered panel system. You can cluster scenes by act, separate story threads into distinct areas, or expand your storyboard into a full treatment on the same board. The unlimited scale means you are never reorganising files to make room for Act Three. The result is a digital storyboard that scales with the project instead of locking you into a page count.

Blueprint Tactics for narrative structure. Add a Hero's Journey Tactic to your canvas and it creates a Blueprint with guided cards for each narrative step: the ordinary world, the call to adventure, the ordeal, and the resolution. Each card has AI assistance that understands the narrative framework. For a filmmaker developing scene structure alongside visual panels, this changes the quality of story decisions. You are placing frames inside a story architecture you can see and edit, not guessing at scene order from a blank grid.

AI chat reads the full canvas and @-mentioned context. When you open AI chat on a Storyflow canvas, the AI reads everything on the current board. @-mention your script document and the Hero's Journey Tactic Blueprint to give it complete project context. Ask it to suggest the visual tone for a scene, identify pacing gaps between acts, or draft a shot list for a specific sequence. The responses land differently when the AI has read the brief and the script, not just the current card.

Documents connected to the board. Write your script, treatment, or director's notes as Documents inside the same project. They live alongside the whiteboard, not in a separate app. During AI chat, you can @-mention up to three Documents alongside one Blueprint Tactic, which means your script and production notes are both available to the AI simultaneously.

Kanban view for scene production tracking. Switch any whiteboard to kanban view to track scenes through production stages: Draft, Needs Reference, Approved, Shot. For video teams tracking which panels have been greenlit without opening a task manager, this keeps the storyboard connected to production status inside the same project.

Pricing: Free (unlimited shared boards, basic AI usage, 20 file uploads). Plus: $7.99/month billed annually or $9.99/month billed monthly (full 200+ Blueprint Tactics, increased AI, unlimited file uploads). Pro: $14/month billed annually or $19/month billed monthly (adds AI image generation and 20× more AI than Plus). Max: $39/month billed annually.

Pros:

• The only storyboarding workspace where AI has narrative context from your script, brief, and story framework before it responds
• Hero's Journey and other Blueprint Tactics teach narrative structure while you build the actual production board
• Unlimited canvas removes space constraints as scenes expand into acts and acts expand into full productions
• Free plan is functional for real solo projects: unlimited projects, basic AI usage, 20 file uploads including Hero's Journey
• Team plan enables real-time collaborative canvas editing, which matters when a director and director of photography block scenes together

Cons:

• No dedicated frame-by-frame panel view with timing annotations or per-frame duration controls. A filmmaker who needs a precise animatic with frame-by-frame timing data will need Boords or a dedicated animatics tool alongside Storyflow for that specific deliverable.
• No in-app drawing tool for frame illustrations. You can upload hand-sketched or AI-generated images to the canvas, but creating the actual frame artwork requires a separate drawing application. Teams who produce drawn storyboards add one step in their workflow.
• The narrative AI workflow requires initial setup: adding a Tactic Blueprint, @-mentioning documents, and framing prompts correctly. Teams expecting to drop frames into a blank grid and have the AI respond immediately will encounter a short learning curve before the context-aware suggestions become useful.

Verdict: Storyflow is the right choice for filmmakers who treat storyboarding as part of a larger creative development process. If the storyboard is embedded in a project that also includes a brief, treatment, and director's vision, Storyflow's connected workspace wins on AI depth and narrative structure. If you need a clean numbered panel grid, PDF export, and client approval workflow and nothing else, Boords is faster to set up and cleaner to deliver.

2. Boords

Boords is the most purpose-built storyboarding tool on this list. It was designed to do one thing well: create, organise, review, and deliver professional storyboard panels for film and animation productions.

Opening a new Boords project for the first time communicates intent immediately. The numbered panel grid is there before you add a single frame. The export button is prominent. The client sharing link is obvious. Every interface decision in Boords serves the production storyboard workflow, which is both its strength and the boundary of what it does.

Best for: Animation studios, advertising agencies, and video production teams who need polished storyboard deliverables with client-facing approval and annotation.

Key features:

Numbered panel grid with customisable aspect ratios. Boords structures the storyboard as a numbered sequence of frames by default. You select the aspect ratio for your production format and the grid adjusts. For productions where frame order and scene numbers correspond directly to a shot list, the numbered sequence removes the manual tracking step that visual canvas tools require.

Animatic preview from uploaded frames. Upload your frame artwork, set timing and transitions, and Boords generates a rough animatic you can play back. For client presentations and internal reviews before production begins, this is the feature that separates Boords from every other tool on this list. No other storyboarding tool in this comparison produces an animatic preview from a non-animated frame sequence with this level of simplicity.

Client approval workflow with panel annotation. Share a link and external clients or collaborators can comment directly on individual frames without creating a Boords account. Comments are visible on the specific panel they reference, replacing the email-attached-PDF feedback cycle. For agencies and studios where client approval is a formal production gate, this workflow improvement is significant.

AI image generation for placeholder frames. Boords added AI image generation that lets you create rough placeholder frames from text descriptions. This is useful for early-stage boards where the visual direction is established but no frame artwork exists yet. The limitation is that the AI has no awareness of your script, brief, or visual references. Each generated frame is independent of the project narrative context.

PDF and image export in multiple formats. Export your complete board as a print-ready PDF with panel numbers, scene descriptions, and timing data. For productions that need to hand off a physical storyboard document to a crew, the export is clean and production-ready.

Pricing: Starts at approximately $16.99/month. Team plans are available at higher tiers. No permanent free plan (14-day free trial).

Pros:

• The most production-ready storyboard output of any tool on this list, with numbered panels, animatic preview, and client annotation in one workflow
• Animatic preview makes Boords a presentation tool, not just a planning tool, which changes how directors use it in pre-production meetings
• Client annotation workflow removes the email-PDF-feedback loop that slows down every production using a general-purpose tool
• Built for the actual deliverable: a storyboard a director, producer, or broadcast client can review, approve, and archive

Cons:

• No narrative or script context. Boords holds frames and scene descriptions but has no awareness of the story connecting them. Pacing, structure, and story decisions stay external to the tool.
• The AI image generation cannot ingest your script, brief, or visual references to inform the generated frames. Placeholder generation is disconnected from project context.
• No canvas environment for the surrounding pre-production work: brief, treatment, visual references, and production notes exist in separate tools.

Verdict: Boords is the right tool when the storyboard is the final output and client delivery is the goal. For agencies and animation studios where professional panel deliverables and asynchronous client approval are part of every production, Boords delivers faster than any alternative on this list. If the storyboard is still part of a development process that includes narrative refinement, visual research, and script revision, Boords stops at the frame and does not help with the story around it.

3. Milanote

Milanote started as a tool for creative directors who think visually before they think in words. It evolved into a flexible visual workspace that many filmmakers use for rough boards because its image-pinning and spatial arrangement workflow matches how visual development actually happens: by proximity, by juxtaposition, by reference next to reference.

It is not a storyboarding tool in any production sense. There are no numbered panels, no frame sequencing, no animatic preview, and no film-specific features. But the way Milanote handles image arrangement on a flexible board makes it the closest to a physical director's pin board of any digital tool on this list.

Best for: Directors and creative directors who develop visual direction by collecting references and rough ideas before committing to produced frame artwork.

Key features:

Pin images, notes, and references onto a flexible visual board. Milanote's board accepts image uploads, web clips, links, notes, and text in a flexible spatial layout. You drag, resize, and arrange content until the visual logic of the scene or sequence becomes clear. For directors who think about colour, texture, and visual rhythm before they think about shot composition, this arrangement-first workflow is valuable in a way that numbered panel grids are not.

Column and grid layout options. While the canvas is flexible, Milanote includes column structures and grid alignment options for teams who want more order in their visual collections. A rough board can move from free-form exploration to a more structured scene-by-scene layout as the visual direction solidifies.

Board-to-board linking for multi-project organisation. Link boards together to create a visual hierarchy: a series overview board that connects to individual episode boards, each with its own reference collection and rough panels. For directors running multiple projects or seasons, this linked structure keeps visual references organised at the right level of specificity.

Simple collaboration through sharing links. Invite team members to edit a board or share a view-only link with external collaborators. Real-time simultaneous editing is available on paid plans, though it is less mature than Miro or Storyflow's collaborative canvas.

Pricing: Free plan includes 100 notes, images, or links and 10 file uploads. Pro is $9.99/month.

Pros:

• The best visual reference organisation of any tool on this list for the direction-development phase before formal storyboarding begins
• Free plan is genuinely useful for a solo director developing one project at a time: 100 notes and 10 uploads covers a rough visual direction document
• The spatial flexibility matches how visual development actually works: pinned next to, contrasted with, and crossed with

Cons:

• No sequence numbering, no animatic preview, no production-specific export format
• AI capabilities are minimal. Milanote has some AI text assistance but no narrative context awareness
• Real-time multi-user collaboration is less stable than Miro or Storyflow, especially on larger boards with many image uploads
• For a production-ready storyboard, Milanote is a rough visual starting point, not a deliverable

Verdict: Use Milanote for the visual development phase: the exploration before the storyboard is formalised. Use Boords or Storyflow when you need a board that connects to production. Milanote is the best tool for "what should this feel like visually" and the wrong tool for "here are the 40 approved frames for this production."

4. Miro

Best for: Creative and marketing teams that run storyboarding as a facilitated collaborative workshop rather than a solo production task.

Pricing: Free plan (3 editable boards). Paid from $8/user/month billed annually.

Miro has storyboard templates and sticky note voting tools that make group planning sessions work. Teams who storyboard together, sorting scenes and debating shot options, get more from Miro's facilitation features than from any dedicated storyboarding tool. The timer, voting, and comment tools are native to Miro in a way that other canvas tools do not match. At $8/user/month, a five-person production team pays $480/year for a tool that does storyboarding plus everything else they already use it for. The limitation is that Miro's storyboarding is a template sitting on top of a general whiteboard, not a purpose-built narrative environment. The AI responds to the selected element, not to the full project script or story structure.

5. Celtx

Best for: Production teams running a full pre-production pipeline who need their script and storyboard in the same managed workspace.

Pricing: Starts at approximately $15/month. No permanent free plan.

Celtx is the oldest integrated pre-production suite on this list. Screenwriting, storyboarding, shot lists, and production scheduling connect inside a single platform. The link between scene dialogue and visual panels is the feature that separates Celtx from every canvas-first tool: when a scene changes in the script, the storyboard connection updates. For productions running a real production office workflow, this pipeline integration has genuine value. The limitation is that each individual feature is outperformed by a specialist tool. Storyboarder produces a better drawing environment. Boords produces cleaner deliverables. Celtx is for teams who value the connected pipeline over the quality of any single feature within it.

6. Studiobinder

Best for: Indie filmmakers and small production companies who need production management, shot lists, and storyboarding in one platform.

Pricing: Starts at approximately $29/month. Free plan available with limited projects.

Studiobinder is the most complete film production management platform on this list. Shot lists, call sheets, shooting schedules, script breakdowns, and storyboarding coexist in one project. The storyboard feature lets you attach frame images to individual shots and export a visual shot list. For productions running a real production office, Studiobinder operates at the right scale. The storyboard is useful rather than exceptional: it is a frame-attachment system adjacent to shot data, not a visual development environment. For teams already managing production in Studiobinder, adding storyboards in the same platform makes sense. For teams whose primary need is storyboarding, the $29/month entry point is steep.

7. Canva

Best for: Marketing and brand teams who need a presentable visual storyboard quickly for campaign concept presentations.

Pricing: Free plan available. Pro at $14/month.

Canva's storyboard templates are the fastest way to produce a polished rough board for a marketing video concept presentation. Choose a template, drop in scene descriptions and rough visuals, and export as a PDF or slide deck. For agencies presenting campaign concepts to clients who need visual clarity, not production detail, Canva storyboards look right. The limitation is that Canva is a design output tool. The storyboard it produces looks polished but develops no narrative. There is no scene structure logic, no script connection, and no production pipeline. It is a presentation format, not a production tool.

8. FigJam

Best for: Design and product teams using Figma who need to storyboard user flows, product demos, or onboarding sequences.

Pricing: $3/collaborator seat per month billed annually through Figma. Free plan available.

FigJam is the obvious choice for Figma-native teams who need to storyboard adjacent to their design work. The canvas structure suits UX and product storyboarding: frames, sticky notes, and connectors map naturally to user journey sequences. The AI sticky note sorting is a genuine time-saver for teams organising a large number of story beats before sequencing them. For narrative film or video storyboarding, FigJam requires more manual setup than Boords or Milanote. The tool is built for product logic, not cinematic structure. For design teams whose storyboard is a product demo or onboarding flow, it is already in the right ecosystem.

9. Storyboarder by Wonderunit

Free. Open-source. Desktop application built specifically for filmmakers who draw their own frames. Storyboarder is the most filmmaking-intentional tool in its price bracket, which is zero. The drawing interface is designed for frame composition: you draw a frame, write the action and dialogue for that scene, and move to the next panel. No collaboration, no cloud sync, no AI. You draw frames, you export a board.

Pricing: Free.

Verdict: The best free option for solo filmmakers who sketch their own frames. Not competitive for teams, cloud-based workflows, or any AI-assisted pre-production.

10. Figma

Figma is a professional design tool that can hold a storyboard if you configure the right frames and components. It is not built for filmmaking or narrative storyboarding. For design teams whose storyboard is adjacent to UI or product work, staying inside Figma rather than opening a separate tool can make sense when the storyboard is simple. For everyone else, the setup cost to produce a production-quality storyboard in a tool designed for interface design is not worth the output.

Pricing: $12/editor/month billed annually. Free plan available.

Verdict: Only rational if your team is already deep in Figma and the storyboard is about product flow, not narrative film.

11. Notion

Notion's database structure can hold a production storyboard as a table: scene number, description, shot type, status, image attachment. Many production teams use a Notion database as a combined shot list and storyboard tracker. What Notion cannot do: arrange images spatially, sequence frames visually in a way that communicates scene flow, or connect to AI with narrative context from the project. It is a production management tool used for storyboarding by teams that want to minimise the number of subscriptions they manage.

Pricing: $12/user/month billed annually. Free plan available.

Verdict: Not a storyboarding tool. A functional storyboard tracker if you are already running production management inside Notion and the board complexity is low.

12. Whimsical

Whimsical's flowchart and wireframe tools have been adapted for lightweight storyboarding by UX and content teams who need a sequence without committing to a film-specific tool. The clean interface and fast setup are its strengths. The limitation is that Whimsical was built for logical diagrams, not visual storytelling. At $10/editor/month, you are paying for a diagramming tool that handles storyboarding as a secondary use case.

Pricing: $10/editor/month. Free plan includes 3 boards.

Verdict: Workable for simple flow-based storyboards. Not recommended for narrative film, animation, or any production where visual pacing and shot composition matter.

Free vs Paid: Best Storyboarding Software 2026

What free plans in this category typically include:

• A limited number of boards or projects (Storyflow: unlimited shared boards with basic AI usage; Miro: 3 editable boards; Milanote: 100 notes and 10 uploads)
• Enough capacity to test the workflow on a real short production
• Basic sharing and view access for collaborators
• No animatic preview, no client approval workflows, no production-specific PDF export

What paid plans unlock:

• Unlimited projects and storyboard boards
• Client-facing approval links with panel annotation (Boords)
• Full AI capabilities: unlimited generations and access to the complete 200+ Tactics library (Storyflow Pro)
• Real-time collaborative editing on the same canvas (Storyflow Max plan, from $39/month)
• Production-quality export: PDF storyboards, PNG frames, animatic video preview
• Priority support and team admin controls

When free is enough: A solo filmmaker developing a short film or music video can run a complete rough board on Storyflow's free plan. Unusually generous: unlimited boards, unlimited cards (notes, images, links), unlimited collaboration with as many teammates as you want, basic AI usage, and 20 file uploads, forever, no credit card. Covers development, the storyboard, and the final shot list across many projects. Basic AI usage is sufficient when prompts are specific and contextual. Storyboarder by Wonderunit is completely free and covers any solo filmmaker who draws their own frames.

When upgrading pays off: A five-person production team running simultaneous projects hits the free project limit within a week. Storyflow Plus at $7.99/month unlocks the full Tactics library with 200+ narrative and creative frameworks; Pro at $14/month adds AI image generation and 20× more AI than Plus for scene development. For teams spending several hours per week in visual pre-production, the AI narrative context alone reduces revision cycles significantly. Boords becomes worth its subscription the moment you have a client who needs to annotate frames without an email chain.

Best value for narrative film and video development: Storyflow. The AI reads your script references and applies proven narrative frameworks through Blueprint Tactics, keeping creative context connected throughout pre-production. Best for client-facing panel delivery: Boords. Start your first Storyflow storyboard for free and see the difference AI context makes

Final Verdict: Best Storyboarding Software 2026

If you want a storyboarding environment where the AI understands your narrative before it responds, Storyflow is the answer. Add your script as a Document, apply a Hero's Journey Blueprint Tactic to the same canvas, and the AI reads both before suggesting scene structure, visual tone, or pacing decisions. No other tool on this list offers that level of story context. The canvas holds your brief, reference images, scene panels, and production notes together. A 12-scene rough board becomes part of a complete pre-production environment, not a deliverable isolated in a separate app. Start building your storyboard in Storyflow for free

If you want the cleanest frame-delivery tool with client annotation and animatic preview, Boords wins that category honestly. For advertising agencies and animation studios where professional panel output and asynchronous client approval are non-negotiable parts of production, Boords delivers faster than anything else on this list.

If you want visual reference development before committing to drawn frames, Milanote's board format is the most natural environment for direction work. Use it for the exploration phase, then move to Storyflow or Boords when production begins.

If you want team storyboarding workshops where a group builds the board together in real time, Miro's facilitation tools are still the most developed for that specific scenario. Not a film-first tool, but for collaborative planning sessions, the template library and voting features work.

If you want an integrated pre-production pipeline with no additional tools, Celtx or Studiobinder are the right scale. Both connect the storyboard to a larger production workflow that includes script, scheduling, and shot management.

The best storyboarding software is the one that fits your actual production process. Start with how the storyboard connects to the rest of your pre-production, not with how a product looks in a feature tour. For a closer look at how Storyflow approaches this, see the storyboard software overview.