Write the document
next to the thinking.

The editing features are broadly similar. Rewrite a selection, summarize a page, change the tone, continue a paragraph. The difference is scope of context. In a page-based tool the assistant sees the page, and anything else has to be pasted in or linked. In Storyflow the document sits on a canvas, so the assistant can read the moodboard, the plan, the research clippings, and the notes around it. That is the difference between a draft that is fluent and a draft that is actually about your project.

Not during early access. Storyflow is paid-only right now, with plans starting at $9.99 a month, and a Free plan launches before the end of 2026. One thing that is free today: anyone a paid member invites to a board joins free, so a collaborator, a client, or a co-writer can work with you without their own subscription. If you need a free option this minute, Google Docs and Notion both have capable free tiers, and neither will put your document next to a canvas.

You can collaborate on a shared canvas, and teammates can work on the project together. To be straight about it though, Google Docs is better than us at many people typing into one document simultaneously. That is a decade of engineering on a very specific problem and we do not claim to have matched it. Storyflow's collaboration strength is different: multiple people working across one canvas of boards and documents, plus view-only and comment-only links for reviewers who should read but not edit.

It can produce a first draft from the material on your canvas, and for a lot of documents that draft is genuinely usable as a starting point. It is not built to be the last word. The assistant is best at the mechanical passes: getting past the blank page, restructuring sections, tightening a paragraph, summarizing a long draft, and pointing out what is missing. The judgment about what the document should argue stays with you, and every suggestion is an edit you accept or throw away.

Yes, and it is one of the most used paths on the canvas. Sticky notes, cards, and clustered groups carry real structure, which is exactly what a first draft needs. Ask the AI to write from a board and it follows the grouping and the ordering you already established rather than inventing its own. It works the other direction too. A document that has become unwieldy can be broken out onto the canvas as cards, where a sequencing problem you could not see in the text becomes obvious quickly.

Headings, bold, italic, underline and strikethrough, ordered and unordered lists, checklists, quotes, code blocks, tables, dividers, links, and inline images and embeds. Slash commands and the usual keyboard shortcuts work the way they do in any modern editor. It is a real rich text editor, not a notes field. What it deliberately is not is a page-layout tool, so if you need precise print typesetting, write here and lay it out somewhere built for that.

Yes. Share a view-only link and they open the document, and the canvas around it, in a browser with no signup. That is often the whole point: the reader gets the recommendation and the evidence in one view instead of a document that asserts things and a deck that explains them. If you want feedback rather than just readership, comment access lets a reviewer leave notes without any ability to edit or move what is on the canvas.

Yes. Export the document as a PDF, or export the whole canvas as a high-quality image or PDF when the surrounding context matters as much as the text. Documents that need to continue their life in another tool can leave. We would rather you stayed because the canvas is useful than because your writing is stuck inside it, and a tool that traps documents tends to be a tool people quietly stop putting real work into.

Storyflow runs in the browser and there is a mobile app, so reading and light editing on a phone are fine. Heavy writing and canvas work are much better on a larger screen, which is true of most infinite canvas tools. On offline drafting, Craft is genuinely better: it is a native app built for writing without a connection, and if you regularly draft on planes or trains with no signal, that is a real reason to pick it over any browser-based editor including this one.

For visual, project-shaped work, yes. If your documents sit alongside moodboards, plans, storyboards, or research and you keep wishing the doc and the board were in the same place, the canvas model fits better than nested pages. If your workspace is built on databases, relations, rollups, and filtered views, Notion is doing something we do not do and you should keep it. Plenty of people run both: Notion as the structured wiki, Storyflow as the place projects are actually thought through.

Storyflow is paid-only during early access with plans from $9.99 a month, and that covers unlimited documents and boards with no object cap, AI usage, and sharing. A Free plan arrives before the end of 2026. Competitor pricing changes often enough that quoting it here would be misleading, so check their sites directly. The useful comparison is not the monthly number anyway, it is whether you end up paying for a document tool and a canvas tool separately.